Monday, April 03, 2006

Schaeffer on the church and Armstrong on the PCA

A friend sent me this article tonight by John Armstrong in which he conveys his concern for the Presbyterian Church in America. It articulates well some concerns/sentiments that have been bouncing around in my own mind in recent months (maybe even years). Here is an excerpt from that article (emphasis mine):
I also have a growing concern for the PCA. This is a conflicted denomination. This conflict does not come from the Left at all, like it does in so many of the older fellowships in America. This denomination is not fighting about homosexual ordination or the adoption of anti-Semitic overtures with regard to the state of Israel. This conflict, and the spirit that energizes it, comes from the far Right. You see, the PCA has a very vocal minority of folks who just can’t stop arguing. They seem to thrive on polemics. Every controversy known to conservative Christianity seems to eventually find its way into the PCA. I have been reminded of this again over the last few weeks. One theological overture after another keeps surfacing and making its way into the bloodstream of the PCA, poisoning the missional good of this fellowship over and over again. I do not know how long this group can sustain this kind of hostility.
How long can we sustain this kind of hostility?

I'm not sure, but on a related note, I finished up Francis Schaeffer's True Spirituality last week. I was struck by the clarity of his thoughts on prayer and characteristics which the church ought to exhibit and how we as Christians are to work to make it so. On page 146, Schaeffer speaks of how we as the church (Christians) are to live in relationship with each other and the subsequent changes that are (or should be?) wrought in us as we are continually conformed more and more to the image of Christ.

Frankly, in many ways the church, or at least cultural-Christianity/American-evangelicalism (and I am afraid maybe even much of the PCA), has lost sight of the communal aspect of our calling. We have made church into a building or a denomination or a system of narrowly defined doctrines or a place you go on Sundays (and sometimes Wednesdays) and have forgotten that we are commanded to "Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another. "

In response to this lack of community and un-love we are tempted to respond just as unbiblically, often by using the world's methods or worse by completely disengaging, throwing up our hands and walking away. And sadly, by so doing, we engage in the very action we deplore; we don't want to love people who are hard to love. We want everybody to conform to our own wishes and do things our way. Schaeffer proposes that we pray and goes on to write:

The Armstrong article and the Schaeffer ideas intersect where the church has forgotten: that it is for Christ.

We have instead become hypnotized by what we are against. We pledge fierce loyalty to personalities and parties and organizations and doctrines and forget the centrality of Christ crucified. There must be a way to preserve Biblical fidelity without succumbing to this exponential fragmentation. The party spirit is alive and well.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Batch,

I guess I am guilty of being uninformed about the conflicts within the the PCA. Where would go to learn of the debates within the PCA? I would like know which "theological overture after another" that keeps surfacing?

Mosshouse said...

Wow, Batch. You read my mind. I have been talking to a friend of mine that attending PCA in Nashville before moving to B'ham. She recently married and her husband is not from a reformed background. They have felt really burned by criticism rather than a loving approach by PCAers in B'ham. Rather than encouraging growth and relationship, my sense is they felt attacked. She is heartbroken because she loved her church in Nashville but it just has not been a healthy place for her and her husband here in Birmingham. When I get her to come back around, inevitably someone says something "off the cuff" as a "PCA joke" which is "hurtful" to her and she runs away again. ~ Renie

Kate's Dad said...

b.
you are indeed a thoughful guy... you know this is soooooo true.

Keep the good thoughts coming.

andy

Batch said...

Keith, I don't know of one place where you can get a summary of all of the conflicts. As we get nearer to GA, you can keep an eye on the pcaga.com and they'll list the overtures that are being presented. You can also go to byfaithonline.com (the PCA web magazine) and put 'overtures' in the search box and you'll get alot of results.

Or you could go to google and put in variants of any of the following topics mentioned by Armstrong and likely get lots of results:

-justification and the New Perspective on Paul
-the Federal Vision (with related debates about baptism and the Lord’s Supper)
-Norman Shepherd’s misunderstood views on justification and sanctification, the place of liturgy (including weekly communion, forms of worship expression, ministerial robes and clerical collars)
-the role of women (including women serving as ordained deacons and women serving in the military)
-paedocommunion
-Bible translations

Anyhow, I read some theologically oriented blogs a bit too much, so my awareness/sensitivity may be a bit skewed. I also have some friends who have left the PCA in part because of some of these issues. From where I'm sitting it seems that there are a few folks in our midst who are looking to call people with other views of reformed theology heretics and expel them from the fellowship. The internet exacerbates this because now everybody can read what others are writing. I suspect that many of the controversial views have been around in the PCA for quite some time but the accessability to those viewpoints has become far more widespread.

B

Anonymous said...

Batch,

I perused the arhcives of the PCA website and found the language of the overture referred to by Mr. Armstrong. Then I started to read an article (paper that was presented over in merry old England) by the author of the "Justification and New Perspective on Paul" by N. T Wright, a catholic priest. I have to admit that the dictionary was opened more than once. It will take me a while to begin to understand what is being said. As to Federal Vision - I'm not sure, just started to read. Thanks for making me think.

PM Summer said...

Great blog title, great blog post.

However, the Anonynous comment that N.T. Wright is a Catholic Priest is a howler.
N.T. Wright is about as much a Catholic Priest as is D.M. Lloyd-Jones!

Congratulations on all the work.